<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Touring boots - bikechatter : Motorcycling News and Product reviews]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Motorcycle products tested indepth and independently by Bikechatters trusty team of reviewers, if you are looking for a new helmet or boots, leathers or gloves or want the low down on which textiles will keep you dry in the wet and cool in the heat then look no further. With a swathe of new equipment reviews coming through we now look at GPS Sat Nav Devices, Tyres, Exhausts, Covers and other Aftermarket parts so drop by, spread the reviews across your blogs, Facebook or Twitter and help us change the face of motorcycling products.]]></description>
        <link>http://bikechatter.net/</link>
                                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">41-125</guid>
                <title><![CDATA[Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review: Frank Thomas Aqua]]></title>
                                <link>http://bikechatter.net/reviews/44-touring-boots/41-ft-aqua-boot</link>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                    <img src="http://bikechatter.net/images/jreviews/tn/tn_41_list_aqua_1250082064.jpg"  border="0"  alt="Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review"  title="Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review"  align="right"  style="width: 150px; height: 189px"  />                                I have had a pair of these for around 18 months, and have done over 14,000 miles, with some light off road.

I found them to be comfortable but tend to get a little warm in the summer.

They have never left my feet wet even after going through a number of fords.

I did wear them for 24 hours non stop during the 1000 mile Iron Butt challenge last year, with absolutely no issues. 

I'm a firm believer in you in you get what you pay for! These boots have been worth the money and I have had my £50 worth so far.

The only negative is on the left toe a patch has been slightly worn away by the gear change.                ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[Touring boots]]></category>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:33:46 -0700</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">41-6</guid>
                <title><![CDATA[Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review: Conclusion]]></title>
                                <link>http://bikechatter.net/reviews/44-touring-boots/41-ft-aqua-boot</link>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                    <img src="http://bikechatter.net/images/jreviews/tn/tn_41_list_aqua_1250082064.jpg"  border="0"  alt="Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review"  title="Frank Thomas Aqua Boot - review"  align="right"  style="width: 150px; height: 189px"  />                                The Aqua Boot is a snip at only £49.99 which I am sure will appeal to a great number of newer riders or those with less expendable income, its claim to be 100% waterproof is in fact - well - fact although perhaps too waterproof for the breathable layer to do its job. 

This made for an uncomfortable boot from early on and coupled with the bad sizing, I was never really reassured that they would be any good when it mattered, I guess adding an extra layer of socks would bring the ankle and width fit about right but I cannot even begin to think of the foot temperatures involved.                ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[Touring boots]]></category>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:02:27 -0700</pubDate>
            </item>
                        </channel>
</rss>

